Suggested by @eddumelendez in https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/issues/34760, it would be interesting to have service connection support for Hazelcast. Unlike other services, our auto-configuration for Hazelcast leans very heavily on separate configuration files. Specifically, there's no property that's used to provide the address of a Hazelcast instance, instead this is determined from the Hazelcast configuration file. Given this arrangement, there isn't such an obvious mapping of existing properties into connection details.
Comment From: wilkinsona
We might be able to add HazelcastConnectionDetails that exposes a ClientConfig. With some changes to the auto-configuration we could then use the ClientConfig from HazelcastConnectionDetails in favor of any user-provided ClientConfig bean.
Comment From: philwebb
Closing in favor of PR #42416. Thanks @nosan!