Version : Spring Boot 3.3.4 Reference Doc.
Changed the Not Found link provided in the Reference Doc to a link covering the Build Plugin.
The reference Doc already provides a direct content to Jar and War. I think it would create better synergy if you provided a link to the Build Tool rather than providing a removed guide.
Reference Doc : https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/how-to/deployment/traditional-deployment.html#howto.traditional-deployment.convert-existing-application
Not Found Link : Getting Started Guide on Converting a jar to a war.
Suggest Link : Build Tool Plugins
Comment From: pivotal-cla
@IMWoo94 Please sign the Contributor License Agreement!
Click here to manually synchronize the status of this Pull Request.
See the FAQ for frequently asked questions.
Comment From: pivotal-cla
@IMWoo94 Thank you for signing the Contributor License Agreement!
Comment From: snicoll
Thanks for the PR.
The guide has been dropped so this looks like an oversight, see https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/issues/42110
Comment From: IMWoo94
Thank you for finding the issue
The current PR provides a new link, but can I delete it and rewrite it with the code that's been removed?
Comment From: philwebb
Thanks for the PR. I don't think we should reproduce the code from the old guide, but we should update the link when we merge this. It should be xref:build-tool-plugin:index.adoc[]
Comment From: IMWoo94
Update can be carried out in two ways.
1. "See the Getting Started Guide on Converting a jar to a war." comment delete
2. Modify links using xref:build-tool-plugin:index.adoc[]
42110 and the comments
Number 2 provides the same link using xref:build-tool-plugin:index.adoc[] at the top. This is overlapping, and I think option 2 is ambiguous because it is located not far away.
I think option 1 is correct so current PR option 1 apply. Which of the two options do you think is more correct?
Comment From: philwebb
Thanks @IMWoo94