Affects: v5.3.4

In kotlin, non-nullable Int is compiled to java primitive type int, this cause the condition candidateParameter.equals(genericParameter.toClass() always evaluates to false. so org.springframework.core.BridgeMethodResolver#findBridgedMethod fails to find the correct bridge method.

screenshot1

import org.springframework.stereotype.Repository
import org.springframework.transaction.annotation.Transactional

interface GenericInterface<ID> {
    fun delete(id: ID)
}

abstract class AbstractGenericClass<ID> : GenericInterface<ID> {
    override fun delete(id: ID) {
    }
}

@Repository
class GenericRepository : AbstractGenericClass<Int>() {
    @Transactional
    override fun delete(
            id: Int
    ) {
        error("gotcha")
    }
}

the above "GenericRepository" is compiled to 

@Repository
@Metadata(
   mv = {1, 4, 0},
   bv = {1, 0, 3},
   k = 1,
   d1 = {"\u0000\u0018\n\u0002\u0018\u0002\n\u0002\u0018\u0002\n\u0002\u0010\b\n\u0002\b\u0002\n\u0002\u0010\u0002\n\u0002\b\u0002\b\u0017\u0018\u00002\b\u0012\u0004\u0012\u00020\u00020\u0001B\u0005¢\u0006\u0002\u0010\u0003J\u0010\u0010\u0004\u001a\u00020\u00052\u0006\u0010\u0006\u001a\u00020\u0002H\u0017¨\u0006\u0007"},
   d2 = {"Lcom/cpvsn/crud/demo/feat/generic/GenericRepository;", "Lcom/cpvsn/crud/demo/feat/generic/AbstractGenericClass;", "", "()V", "delete", "", "id", "crud-kit.crud-kit-demo.main"}
)
public class GenericRepository extends AbstractGenericClass {
   @Transactional
   public void delete(int id) {
      String var2 = "gotcha";
      boolean var3 = false;
      throw (Throwable)(new IllegalStateException(var2.toString()));
   }

   // $FF: synthetic method
   // $FF: bridge method
   public void delete(Object var1) {
      this.delete(((Number)var1).intValue());
   }
}

Due to this issue, the @Transactional on delete(id: Int) method have no effects at all. I'm not sure if this project is expected to be compatible with Kotlin code. If it is, then this is a bug, I think I can try to submit a PR to fix it.

Comment From: sdeleuze

@jhoeller I have little experience with bridge methods, but based on my initial findings with this test, my current thinking is that we could add Kotlin specific code path in BridgeMethodResolver#isResolvedTypeMatch.

Instead of just doing Type[] genericParameters = genericMethod.getGenericParameterTypes(), we should maybe use KClass<T>.javaObjectType in order to get a type that will be compatible with the rest f the logic. In the use case we have here, java.lang.Integer would be returned for both Kotlin Int and Int? types. But I am not sure KClass<T>.javaObjectType is exposed in Java, to be checked with Kotlin team.

I think you mentioned another potential way to fix that, but I can't remember the details. Any thoughts?

@noob9527 Since you mentioned a PR, any thoughts on what could look like the fix?

Comment From: noob9527

@sdeleuze I think ResolvableType.forMethodParameter(genericMethod, i, declaringClass); will always return a wrapper type. so we can just wrap candidateParameter to its wrapper type before comparing.