Dirk Hoffmann opened SPR-17365 and commented

upgrading to spring-boot 2.1.0.M4 Bean overriding has been disabled by default. If you are relying on overriding, you will need to set spring.main.allow-bean-definition-overriding to true.

But why is a Bean defined in an inner class also treated like a duplicate bean definition. Is this a bug? or has this some explanation?

e.g.:

@Configuration public class BusinessLogicConfig {
    @Configuration class BusinessLogicSourceConfig {
        @Bean public BusinessLogic businessLogic() {
            return new BusinessLogic("source");
        }
    }
}
 

works fine up to spring-boot 2.0.x

but when using e.g. spring-boot 2.1.0.M4 it gives me an error on startup:

The bean 'businessLogic', defined in class path resource [com/example/di/bootconfigs/BusinessLogicConfig$BusinessLogicSourceConfig.class], could not be registered.
 A bean with that name has already been defined in URL [jar:file:/.../di/build/libs/di-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar!/BOOT-INF/classes!/com/example/di/businesslogic/BusinessLogic.class]
 and overriding is disabled.

 Action:

 Consider renaming one of the beans or enabling overriding by setting spring.main.allow-bean-definition-overriding=true
 

As I clearly only have a single definition of the bean (only defined in an inner @Configuration class) this seems like a bug to me.

If you ask why I am using a nested inner @Configuration class:

I often have demo code, demonstrating distributed system behavior in which I need more than one app to demonstrate things. As I don't want to have multiple App code, I just start the same App with different profiles and the profile is injecting "different business logic" which I want to "keep together" in one file, like:

@Configuration
public class BusinessLogicConfig {

    @Value("${app.info.instance_index}")
    private String instanceIndex;

    @Profile({ "source" }) // unused fake BusinessLogic for pure sources
    @Configuration
    class BusinessLogicSourceConfig {
        @Bean
        public BusinessLogic businessLogic() {
            return new BusinessLogic("source", instanceIndex);
        }
    }

    @Profile({ "sink" }) // unused fake BusinessLogic for pure sinks
    @Configuration
    class BusinessLogicSinkConfig {
        @Bean
        public BusinessLogic businessLogic() {
            return new BusinessLogic("sink", instanceIndex);
        }
    }
   @Profile({ "tier1" })
    @Configuration
    class BusinessLogicTier1Config {
        @Bean
        public BusinessLogic businessLogic() {
            return new BusinessLogic("tier1", instanceIndex);
        }
    }

    @Profile({ "tier2" })
    @Configuration
    class BusinessLogicTier2Config {
        @Bean
        public BusinessLogic businessLogic() {
            return new BusinessLogic("tier2", instanceIndex);
        }
    }

    @Profile({ "tier3" })
    @Configuration
    class BusinessLogicTier3Config {
        @Bean
        public BusinessLogic businessLogic() {
            return new BusinessLogic("tier3", instanceIndex);
        }
    }

 }
 

source code at: git@gitlab.com:hoffi_scratch/di.git


Affects: 5.1 GA

Reference URL: https://gitlab.com/hoffi_scratch/di

Comment From: spring-projects-issues

Andy Wilkinson commented

You do have defined two beans named businessLogic. You have a @Bean method called businessLogic. The method name is used as the bean's name so the bean's name is businessLogic. Your BusinessLogic class is annotated with @Component and is being picked up by component scanning. The default bean name for a class named BusinessLogic is businessLogic so you end up with two beans with the same name, hence the attempted override.