We encountered an issue where our custom test execution listener, responsible for cleaning the database after-test, was executed after the ApplicationContext was cleaned up. We had set the listener order to 3000 to prevent conflicts with other internal listeners.

However, we didn't know that DirtiesContextTestExecutionListener had the same order level (3000), leading our cleanup listener to run after the context was marked dirty. This behavior led to unexpected results - Spring initiated a new context since the previous one was removed, resulting in the database being cleaned for another test.

Additionally, it would be great to understand the rationale behind 3000 for DirtiesContextTestExecutionListener. Looks like the logic should be more complex:
after the method marking should be executed last (having listener with the lowest order value), before the method marking should be executed first (listener with the highest order value).

Spring Version: 6.1.13

Comment From: remeio

Hi, You can find the TestExecutionListener subclasses at file spring-test/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring.factories:

# Default TestExecutionListeners for the Spring TestContext Framework
#
org.springframework.test.context.TestExecutionListener = ...

and find this orders: - 1000: org.springframework.test.context.web.ServletTestExecutionListener - 1500: org.springframework.test.context.support.DirtiesContextBeforeModesTestExecutionListener - 1800: org.springframework.test.context.event.ApplicationEventsTestExecutionListener - 1950: org.springframework.test.context.bean.override.BeanOverrideTestExecutionListener - 2000: org.springframework.test.context.support.DependencyInjectionTestExecutionListener - 2500: org.springframework.test.context.observation.MicrometerObservationRegistryTestExecutionListener - 3000: org.springframework.test.context.support.DirtiesContextTestExecutionListener - 3005: org.springframework.test.context.support.CommonCachesTestExecutionListener - 4000: org.springframework.test.context.transaction.TransactionalTestExecutionListener - 5000: org.springframework.test.context.jdbc.SqlScriptsTestExecutionListener - 10000: org.springframework.test.context.event.EventPublishingTestExecutionListener - Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE - 100: org.springframework.test.context.bean.override.mockito.MockitoResetTestExecutionListener

At design, I thinks this order magic values use to determine the relative order of TestExecutionListener subclasses, but spring isn't support the relative order(See more at #33595 ), it just have the order value (a int value).

At use, If you want add a new TestExecutionListener subclass which: - before CommonCachesTestExecutionListener - and after DirtiesContextTestExecutionListener

You can set the order like 3001 (3000 < order < 3005), it will work like the relative order.

Finally, I think It's necessary to add the comment for the method XXXTestExecutionListener#getOrder, otherwise we will face too much magic value. Actually, BeanOverrideTestExecutionListener already has a nice comment:

/**
 * Returns {@code 1950}, which ensures that the {@code BeanOverrideTestExecutionListener}
 * is ordered after the
 * {@link org.springframework.test.context.support.DirtiesContextBeforeModesTestExecutionListener
 * DirtiesContextBeforeModesTestExecutionListener} and just before the
 * {@link DependencyInjectionTestExecutionListener}.
 */
@Override
public int getOrder() {
  return 1950;
}

Comment From: remeio

@snicoll Hi, I had created a PR #34265 to comment the relative order of other TestExecutionListener subclasses like BeanOverrideTestExecutionListener#getOrder.

Comment From: sbrannen

Hi @tfactor2,

I don't understand the basis for your claim that "DirtiesContextTestExecutionListener has an unexpected execution order."

All TestExecutionListener implementations have a documented order since the ordering support was introduced in Spring Framework 4.1. See #16092 and commit e6d16148e576fafe094c2bc1ef975c25576eeb7b.

The Ordering TestExecutionListener Implementations section of the reference manual also states the following.

AbstractTestExecutionListener and all default TestExecutionListener implementations provided by Spring implement Ordered with appropriate values. Third-party frameworks and developers should therefore make sure that their default TestExecutionListener implementations are registered in the proper order by implementing Ordered or declaring @Order. See the javadoc for the getOrder() methods of the core default TestExecutionListener implementations for details on what values are assigned to each core listener.

In light of the above, I am closing this issue as "works as designed".

Regards,

Sam

Comment From: sbrannen

Hi @remeio,

Finally, I think It's necessary to add the comment for the method XXXTestExecutionListener#getOrder, otherwise we will face too much magic value.

Indeed, that would be useful, and I will process PR #34265 that you submitted. 👍

Actually, BeanOverrideTestExecutionListener already has a nice comment:

Glad you like it! That was the last TestExecutionListener I documented, and you're right: it sets a good precedent regarding explaining the order value.

but spring isn't support the relative order (See more at #33595), it just have the order value (a int value).

FYI: That issue is related to aspect ordering (AOP) and is unrelated to TestExecutionListener ordering.

Comment From: nizametdinovcrx

@sbrannen, thanks for pointing that out. A few things can be improved though, in my opinion: 1. Add a few statements about order value interpretation for after methods: org.springframework.test.context.TestContextManager.afterTestExecution:

public void afterTestExecution(Object testInstance, Method testMethod, @Nullable Throwable exception)
....
    // Traverse the TestExecutionListeners in reverse order to ensure proper
   // "wrapper"-style execution of listeners.
  for (TestExecutionListener testExecutionListener : getReversedTestExecutionListeners()) {

  1. Expose the order of system listeners as constants - then application developers can refer to these values in their getOrder implementations and calculate order dynamically (DirtiesContextBeforeModesTestExecutionListener.ORDER + 10, for example).

  2. "Reserve" some ranges for system listeners (the documentation should be enough, I think). For example, "system listeners should reside in the range 0-10000 and Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE - 10000. If possible, use the rest of the range to avoid breaking system functionality".

Comment From: sbrannen

Thanks for the proposals, @nizametdinovcrx.

Feedback

  1. Add a few statements about order value interpretation for after methods:

I partially addressed that in commit 9d3374b28df667f6e1e0af51f4f74f9448bed4e5, and I have raised #34422 to further improve the documentation.

  1. Expose the order of system listeners as constants - then application developers can refer to these values in their getOrder implementations and calculate order dynamically (DirtiesContextBeforeModesTestExecutionListener.ORDER + 10, for example).

I addressed that in #34404.

  1. "Reserve" some ranges for system listeners (the documentation should be enough, I think). For example, "system listeners should reside in the range 0-10000 and Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE - 10000. If possible, use the rest of the range to avoid breaking system functionality".

MockitoResetTestExecutionListener already has a published order value of Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE - 100. So, Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE - 10000 wouldn't be an option at this point.

In any case, in the future we may have our own valid reasons to introduce a core "system" listener that does not have an order value in one of those ranges. In light of that, I don't think it warrants attempting to define a reserved range. Furthermore, those ranges are not actually reserved for core listeners, and third parties are actually encouraged to introduce listeners with order values within those ranges so that they can be positioned correctly.

Related Issues

  • 34265

  • 34404

  • 34422

Comment From: nizametdinovcrx

@sbrannen, great, thx!