CompositeMeterRegistryAutoConfiguration
might actually not create a composite registry. We should probably rename it to MeterRegistryAutoConfiguration
.
Comment From: evenh
Just updated some autoconfiguration code depending on CompositeMeterRegistryAutoConfiguration
from v2.3.4.RELEASE
to 2.4.0-M3
and traced it back to this issue. It broke my configuration classes and test code.
My question is: CompositeMeterRegistryAutoConfiguration
not extending MeterRegistryAutoConfiguration
, is it a deliberate choice?
Comment From: philwebb
@evenh Thanks for raising this, we're going to revert the rename before GA