Redis 6.0.8

Redis HA: - 3 sentinels - 2 redis(one master as A and 1 repica as B)

operations: 1. stop A 2. B becomes new master 3. close B 4. A becomes master

Is the case correct?If set key after 2 step, then the key is not found after 4. So I think step 4 should not happen. I guess the reason is that A always thought he was master.

Comment From: moticless

Not sure I understand the flow. Is there a difference between "stop" and "close"? Is A becomes available again? If so, at what point? If not, then to my best understanding all sentinels will keep the last master that all sentinels agreed on, which is B.