The delim_whitespace options no longer works when specifying a skip_footer other then zero. I can replicate the behavior in 0.12 with the following example:

import pandas as pd
from StringIO import StringIO

indata = StringIO("""1.2   5.6   8.5
4.5   6.7   6.4


""")

indata.seek(0)
df = pd.read_csv(indata, delim_whitespace=True, header=None, skip_footer=2)

Which returns:

                 0
0  1.2   5.6   8.5
1  4.5   6.7   6.4

Note how its only one column, instead of three. Changing the skip_footer to 0 makes it work as expected. 

indata.seek(0)
df = pd.read_csv(indata, delim_whitespace=True, header=None, skip_footer=0)

Returns:

     0    1    2
0  1.2  5.6  8.5
1  4.5  6.7  6.4
2  NaN  NaN  NaN
3  NaN  NaN  NaN

If the above example is used with something like names=['a','b','c'] an (obvious) 'ValueError' exception occurs: Expected 3 fields in line 1, saw 1.

Comment From: jreback

pushing to 0.14

Comment From: jtratner

this combination is just not supported at all any more, so either close this or change this to a request to support both delim_whitespace and skip_footer in one engine and/or to deal with the bug listed at end?

In [5]: df = pd.read_csv(indata, delim_whitespace=True, header=None, skip_footer=2)
Traceback (most recent call last)
    ...
ValueError: Falling back to the 'python' engine because the 'c' engine does not support skip_footer, but this causes 'delim_whitespace' to be ignored as it is not supported by the 'python' engine.

However, it fails badly if you switch to a regex delimiter:

>>> pd.read_csv(indata, sep='\s+', header=None, skip_footer=2)
Empty DataFrame
Columns: [0, 1, 2]
Index: []

Comment From: gfyoung

@jreback : this isn't an issue anymore. You can most certainly specify both together now.

>>> from pandas import read_csv
>>> from pandas.comat import StringIO
>>> data = """1.2   5.6   8.5
4.5   6.7   6.4


"""
>>> read_csv(StringIO(data), delim_whitespace=True, header=None, skip_footer=2,
skip_blank_lines=False, engine='python')   # skip_footer not supported in C engine
     0    1    2
0  1.2  5.6  8.5
1  4.5  6.7  6.4

Comment From: jorisvandenbossche

Indeed. Note that the last comment from @jtratner about it failing was due to skip_blank_lines=True by default because of which the skipfooter was not needed anymore